Paddington
in Peru (2024)
4/10
Starring
Hugh
Bonneville
Emily
Mortimer
Julie
Walters
Jim
Broadbent
Directed
by Dougal Wilson
This
third addition to the Paddington Bear movie franchise is not as amazing as the
previous two. The acting is still good from the adults, the voice casting is
still on point, but the story feels dragged out. The first ten minutes of the
movie are so boring that I was begging for something to happen. There’s a long
talk about how things in the Browns' house have changed because the children
are older. But that could have been done in a better way, instead of the ten minutes of
screen time to know that the kids have grown up and are now acting like
teenagers.
After
this comes the letter, which kicks off the whole idea of the family going to
Peru. Paddington 3 follows the Browns on their trip to Peru after they receive
a letter from the Reverend Mother of the Home for Retired Bears, saying Aunt
Lucy has been acting strange. Most of the original cast reprises their roles,
except for Mary Brown. Sally Hawkins is no longer playing her, and Emily
Mortimer takes over the role. It’s a noticeable change, but from my
perspective, I’m not sure how other viewers will feel about it.
So, the
Browns and Paddington arrive in Peru and head to the Home for Retired Bears,
only to discover that Aunt Lucy has gone missing as the Reverend Mother informs
them. Distraught, Paddington searches her room and finds a map and with
guidance from the Reverend Mother, they conclude that Aunt Lucy has set off on
an adventure, marking a specific location on the map as her starting point.
Oh my
gosh! This movie does not draw you in. It drags its feet so much before
anything actually happens that you feel like you’re being punished. The only
highlight is Antonio Banderas, whose character and performance are memorable,
other than that, the whole movie is a forgettable journey. Its badly paced and,
at times, very predictable, for an adventure about finding the city of gold Eldorado,
which is tied to the absence of Aunt Lucy, you would have expected better.
I can
tell you nothing actually happens, even when you have gone halfway into the
movie, and the lighthearted fun we usually get from Paddington’s antics, which
are innocent but always wildly disruptive, is drowned in the boredom of this
movie. And since the writing is poor and every character’s intention is exposed
from the start, there’s no suspense to make up for it. The previous movies also
didn’t rely on suspense, but they worked because of good writing. Here, without
that, the whole thing just feels like a chore.
If you
have the time to see this movie—don’t because it’s not worth it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment