Here’s a movie
that ditches the seriousness of the first
and second
Superman films and adds a heavy dose of comedy, thanks to the
introduction of Richard Pryor. This new direction turned many viewers off, but
for me, while this movie isn’t as good as the first two, it’s still an
interesting and enjoyable film you can watch with your family.
The movie’s
production had its quirks. The female lead is Lana Lang, played by Annette
O’Toole, instead of Lois Lane. O’Toole delivers a wonderful performance as
Lana, but let’s be honest—what’s Superman without Lois? This happened because
the producers had issues with Margot Kidder, sidelining her character to a
cameo appearance.
The producers
also brought back their desired writers, David and Leslie Newman, who had
wanted to make Superman a comedic film from the start. Richard
Donner, who directed Superman I and part of Superman II,
had rewritten the scripts for both movies (which were shot back-to-back) to
make them serious and impactful. But since the producers parted ways with
Donner during Superman II (1980),
they returned to their original vision for Superman III.
The best part of
this movie is Christopher Reeve. His portrayal of a corrupted Superman is
memorable and something you have to see. When I think about this movie, what
stands out is how Reeve convincingly pulled off an evil Superman. The battle
between his good and bad sides in the junkyard is also a sight to behold.
When Ross’s plan
to manipulate the weather is thwarted by Superman, he decides to create
Kryptonite to kill him. However, Gus, tasked with this mission, realizes that
one of the components of Kryptonite is an unknown element. He substitutes it
with tar, resulting in a compound that doesn’t weaken or kill Superman—it turns
him evil.
Now, Ross begins
his plans, and the only person who can stop him doesn’t care anymore.
In the end, the
movie was a critical failure but a moderate commercial success, though it
didn’t make as much money as the previous two films.
0 comments:
Post a Comment