The Adventures of Robin Hood
(1938)
4/10
Starring
Errol Flynn
Olivia de Havilland
Basil Rathbone
Directed by Michael Curtiz and
William Keighley
Before seeing the movie, I saw a
clip from it and was worried the movie would not live up to the hype that
follows it from my view. Then I saw the movie and still I cannot understand the
hype that seems to follow this movie. The movie was not funny, the adventures
were stretched over not a well-constructed subplot and the Robin character was
an over confident brat.
There must be something else
about this movie that people praise because I look at the characters and the
plot and to be honest I do not like this film and wonder why some say it was the
best adaptation.
I have seen many adaptations of
this British folklore hero, and I even believe Mel Brooks 1993 Men in Tights
was better than this. but there have been only two Robin Hood adaptations that
matter from my view. One being Disney’s 1973
animation Robin Hood and the best of the them all the BBC 1984
series, Robin of Sherwood. It combined an amazing set design with real-life
history, 20th century fiction, and pagan who can forget the use of witchcraft
and magic.
This movie may have lacked the
deep adult content of BBC’s Robin of Sherwood but it lacked more
in its story telling, below is the plot.
Richard the Lionheart was being
held captive by Leopold V of Austria while he was returning from the Holy Land.
Richard’s treacherous brother Prince John takes the throne and proceeds to
oppress the people raising their taxes to secure his own position. Taking all
the gold the people have with the claim of trying to pay the ransom for his
brother King Richard.
One man started an uprising against
Prince John, the man named Robin of Locksley (Errol Flynn). Robin later became
known by the people as Robin Hood. He pulled to himself many other outlaws and
outcast to form for himself his merry men. Robin and his crew only had one main
objective, to take from Prince John and give it to the starving people.
His stealing and ruining of the
Prince John’s plans became a problem for the Prince and his cohorts that they
were ready to do anything to catch him. The love interest Lady Marian came to
be when she was being escorted by Sir Guy of Gisborne (Basil Rathbone) and they were ambushed by
Robin.
One thing I looked forward to in this movie was Basil Rathbone showing us some masterful swordsmanship. Rathbone is one of the best swordsman in the acting business and it was he who taught Errol Flynn. So their final battle was the only thing in this movie that mattered to me, and that only was an additional two points. It was done with masterful cinematography, at one time only their shadows could be seen battling. If not for that battle I will have given this movie a two over ten.
One thing I looked forward to in this movie was Basil Rathbone showing us some masterful swordsmanship. Rathbone is one of the best swordsman in the acting business and it was he who taught Errol Flynn. So their final battle was the only thing in this movie that mattered to me, and that only was an additional two points. It was done with masterful cinematography, at one time only their shadows could be seen battling. If not for that battle I will have given this movie a two over ten.
At the time of its release it was
Warner Bros most expensive movie and their most expensive color movie project. The
movie that same year went ahead to win three Academy Awards for, Best Art
Direction, Best Original Score and Best Film Editing.
I stand my ground in saying I do
not understand why people rated this movie all so well.
0 comments:
Post a Comment