Social Icons

Silver Blaze or Murder at the Baskerville (1937)



Silver Blaze or Murder at the Baskerville (1937)



5/10



Starring
Arthur Wontner
Ian Fleming


Directed by Thomas Bentley

Silver Blaze, or Murder at the Baskervilles, stars Arthur Wontner, who plays Sherlock Holmes in this 1937 adaptation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Silver Blaze. Arthur Wontner is flanked by Ian Fleming, who plays Dr. Watson. The movie has a very bad score—the music was more annoying than appealing—and the acting by the extras is all out of place, making it harder to appreciate this movie.

Arthur Wontner’s portrayal of the famous detective can be seen as dull in this movie, and Watson is ever so silent, with Holmes doing too much detecting and talking, which makes it look a little too unrealistic. The movie has a weak story, and the directing is poor, as you can spot many flaws in the tale. The story doesn’t carry you along as it should.

The movie starts by introducing the antagonist and Holmes’ arch-enemy, Professor Moriarty, as he plans another dark scheme. Sherlock Holmes (Arthur Wontner), on the other hand, receives an invite from an old friend to come spend the holidays with him. The invite is from Sir Henry Baskerville, whom Holmes helped 20 years earlier in getting rid of the hound that haunted the Baskervilles.

Holmes reluctantly agrees to go after Dr. Watson (Ian Fleming) convinces him that he needs a break from the endless cases they’ve been handling. While staying with the Baskervilles (Henry and his daughter, who is there with her fiancĂ©), the two (Holmes and Watson) find themselves in the middle of a double murder mystery and the theft of a prized horse, Silver Blaze.

Now, Holmes and Watson have to put their holiday on hold because they need to solve this mystery, find the missing horse before the big race, and bring Professor Moriarty and the criminals behind it all to justice.

Silver Blaze was made and released in 1937, and the movie was re-released in America in 1941 as Murder at the Baskervilles, with the producers hoping to ride on the success of Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce’s The Hound of the Baskervilles (1939). Since this movie is set 20 years after the events of The Hound, it’s made to look like a sequel to the Rathbone/Bruce Hound of the Baskervilles.

Well, as old as it is, you’ll have to excuse the poor video quality, but the story itself is dull. If you don’t fall asleep watching this, you still won’t be recommending this flick to anyone.


0 comments:

Post a Comment

Disclaimer

All images featured on this site are the property of their respective copyright owners. They are used solely for illustrative and commentary purposes under fair use principles. This site is a personal blog, unaffiliated with or endorsed by any copyright holders. If you are the copyright owner of an image featured here and wish to have it removed, please contact me directly, and I will address your request promptly.